Tag: Small Business Inventory Management

  • Small Business Inventory Management

    Managing inventory variability is a constant struggle in business one tool to help manage this is a regression analysis. A regression analysis is a statistical assessment of date that seeks to identify a general overlaying trend. It defines a sample set of date as a line. Like all statistical tools a regression analysis has limitations and without an intuition of the sample data a regression analysis is useless. The following is a sample of how a regression analysis could be used in small business inventory management and how knowledge of the real world implications was taken into account.

    As an operations engineer of an aluminum and bronze casting facility that produces a proprietary line of electrical transmission components it was my job to address product requisitions, generate quotes and do what I can to make the fulfillment of orders go smoothly. One of the dilemmas that we faced was providing parts with a minimal lead time.

    More often then not customers came to us looking for parts they needed quickly, and in the world of power transmission a day can mean thousands upon thousands of dollars lost. We did what we could to get the needed parts out as fast as we could but if a part was not on the shelf there would most certainly be a delay. It isn’t practical to maintain a large inventory all the time due to the carrying costs involved so, as an alternative we kept a select inventory of our most popular parts available.

    As our name grew and more people heard about the product line, our market share also saw growth. This selective inventory model worked nicely for us but with the continual rise in sales comes a need for more parts on hand. The question became; at what rate should we continue to add to our selective inventory?

    Each part had a separate demand so for the sake of this exercise I focused on only one item. I have gathered the quantities sold of this part over a 34 month period. The data is as follows:

    Monthly

    date By Month

    Sum Of qty

     

     

    January 2003

    245

    February 2003

    186

    March 2003

    55

    April 2003

    326

    May 2003

    510

    June 2003

    329

    July 2003

    110

    August 2003

    52

    September 2003

    677

    October 2003

    100

    November 2003

    37

    December 2003

    362

    January 2004

    1014

    February 2004

    45

    March 2004

    136

    April 2004

    186

    May 2004

    196

    June 2004

    60

    July 2004

    213

    August 2004

    239

    September 2004

    191

    October 2004

    151

    November 2004

    32

    December 2004

    190

    January 2005

    1003

    February 2005

    100

    March 2005

    361

    April 2005

    154

    May 2005

    161

    June 2005

    561

    July 2005

    338

    August 2005

    135

    September 2005

    820

    October 2005

    1259

    Now that we have the data we can plot a regression and see our trend. Using Excel QM we find the definition of this trend line to be Y=8.52X+160

    As you can see our quantities are all over the place but there is an indication that we were experiencing an upward trend in our average volume.

    This regression suggests that we were selling 8.52 additional parts every month. If this were the case it would be wise to add 8.52 additional parts to our on hand inventory every month to compensate. The result would be an out put that doubles roughly every 2 years.
    A product that doubles in sales every two years is a great for a company but lets look at the over all sales for each year to see how they match up. Taking a step back to make sure we see the full picture proved to be prudent.  

    Yearly

    date By Year

    Sum Of qty

     

     

    2003

    2989

    2004

    2653

    2005

    4892

       The data that we used to generate our regression shows a dip in sales in 2004 and a spike in 2005. It would be wise to take note of this as the deviation in sales is a good indication that the demand is not constant. If our demand isn’t constant we need to be careful about producing more parts then what we can sell.

    One way to combat this is to make the on site inventory a function of the prior month’s sales. Knowing that the ratio of standard orders to rush orders was about 7:1 we could determine a good starting point for our inventory to be 20% of the prior month’s sales. While this may result in a larger on site inventory then what is required for rush orders, it is more then likely not going to exceed the quantity that we will sell for the month.

    Every bit of data helps us determine what tomorrow might bring but no extent of data will ever insure us as to what tomorrow will bring. The regression analysis provided an indication to our macro rate of change while a quick look at our over all sales showed us that the distribution of sales was not uniform.

    A good practice would be to continually run the regression analysis for different time periods and see if perhaps we could identify potential cycles or seasonal trends that we could later exploit in order to maximize profit.

    I hope this illustrates how a tool like a regression analysis can be helpful but could lead to making wrong decisions if the practical circumstances are not understood. Many people right out of college have a great deal of tools under their belt but often do not know how to properly us them in the real world. My hope is that this illustration will push you to better understand your problems before spouting off a potential solution.